Youre so right Cephian, alotta ppl dont understand this new addition to the game, agro litigation.
When you are attacked by a mob, you can now choose not to melee. Just say, "Talk to my lawyer Mr. Fog Golem, and I'll see you in court!" You are then free to pass, and the mob is served a legal summons.
With lawsuits being all the rage, and the typical solution to all RL problems, kudos to SoE for adding this realistic feature to our gaming experience.
I believe what you meant was agro mitigation :P
Armor of the Faithful
| Quick FactsScroll:Spell: Armor of the Faithful
Expansion:  Duration: 2 hour(s) 24.0 mins |
#REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 08 2005 at 12:14 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) in a matter of speaking, i believe that this spell is one of the worst spells you can get for a cleric, i mean, come on, think about it, why would a cleric need a spell like this? it's just showing you that tanks arent doing there job whenever SOE has to create a line of spells that incorporates more hp's to a class that shouldnt need them to begin with, i mean, when does a cleric solo? you know what im saying? its bs, just shows that again warriors and paladins and the like just arent doing their job sufficent, and so this spell has to pick up the slack of those suckass tanks
1 post
Sounds like you're bitter because you dont understand aggro litagation
#REDACTED,
Posted: Feb 15 2005 at 9:40 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Obviously, you don't even know what tanking is, because it's not litagation (which is actually spelled 'litigation) it's mitigation. The correct terminology for litigation'-(verb) etymology: Latin-Litigatus-past participle of 'litagare' -from lit-, 'lis' lawsuit + 'agere' to drive.
Why are you being a raving idiot about the spell to begin with? Not knocking the fact that you know nothing about the concept of EQ but just saying if you don't know what you're talking about then you shouldn't spout off like that. It only makes you look foolish.
It stacks with Temperance and Ide imagine the 3 seperate cleric buffs
22 posts
I'm surprised nobody else has asked yet, so I will...this is a self only buff, and inferior to the 44 hp/ac combo buff. So does it stack?
Scholar
33 posts
Appears to be in the same line as Armor of Protection (self only, no component) which should stack with both type 1 (Valor / Resolution / Heroic Bond / Temp / Aego / Virtue) and Symbol.
Note that this line does not stack with druid Po9 (unsure of PotC / PotG), at least in its highest form. Also, this will not stack with HoS, Focus or Talisman line from Beastlords and Shaman.
Highest buffed cleric HP comes from Virtue and the last spell in this line (Armor of the Zealot lev 65, which incorporates mana regen).
Sage Nokei Orhaste
Coercer of Luclin
Edited, Fri Jan 30 18:50:14 2004
Note that this line does not stack with druid Po9 (unsure of PotC / PotG), at least in its highest form. Also, this will not stack with HoS, Focus or Talisman line from Beastlords and Shaman.
Highest buffed cleric HP comes from Virtue and the last spell in this line (Armor of the Zealot lev 65, which incorporates mana regen).
Sage Nokei Orhaste
Coercer of Luclin
Edited, Fri Jan 30 18:50:14 2004
37 posts
pretty sure highest hp possible comes from druid protection, cleric symbol and shaman focus lines. not positive
37 posts
pretty sure highest amount of hp possible is druid po9, cleric symbol, and shaman focus. but im not positive
This spell stacks with all cleric buffs.
Does not stack with shaman Focus spells however.
(will stack with infusion of spirit)
Does not stack with shaman Focus spells however.
(will stack with infusion of spirit)
Free account required to post
You must log in or create an account to post messages.© 2024 Fanbyte LLC