Whichever one you have in your primary slot.

I would assume that would be the BoC.

Proc rate is based on procs per minute, regardless of whther the augment is put on a fast or slow weapon.

However, primary hand procs a significant amount higher than secondary, possibly as high as double.

So, with BOC primary, with the aug, you would get more augment procs per minute, than BOC primary and augment in the split blade.

Kallos,

Thanks for the advice and the link to the other string. I was surprised to see so many people flaming the SBoD. I thought it was a pretty decent weapon but I guess I am just a dumbass and should have saved alot of money and got a CHoS. Haha.

I do see that benefit of having a procing weapon that you can add a anger aug to though.

Once again thanks for the reply.

Veteran Spankm Splizankm (65 Warrior) and Elder Ronj Eremy (65 Druid)

There's not much wrong with the SBoD, really. The issue is that a weapon with an innate agro proc + an aug agro proc will cause more hate (via more procs) than a weapon with no innate agro proc + an aug agro proc.

If you hold agro well with your aug'd BoC/SBoD combo, stick with it.

SBoD looks wicked :D

Yes, non-proc weapons are very useful when NOT the MT. After all what raid for 40 people is going to only have one tank along.

All the others need to MINIMIZE their aggro (except the rampage tank). Nothing worse than a raid that progressing nicely on a boss kill, and one of the dps tanks pulls aggro, turning the mob on all the dps, just in time for a cone AOE to go off.

Also, any relatively fast weapon with an Anger 3 proc will hold aggro pretty well. One of the tanks in my guild used to use 2 velium gemmed LS with anger three augs, and MTed very well.

True, a double proc is probably better, but two anger three augs will hold pretty decent aggro no matter what they are augged to.

I would imagine on BoC but...

Your choice!